May 28
Whatever happened to the climate change con?/Klaus calls it right
Both the UN and the media may soon be forced to jettison entirely the myth of a climate science ‘consensus’. If nothing else, the fast rising number of ‘mavericks’ demands it.
Andrew says: You think the UN might regret the fact they used people with no scientific qualifications at all, like Al Gore, to push their dubious assertions? No one should be surprised that many scientists took affront to attempt to stifle debate.
read more | digg story
Vaclav Klaus has re-iterated the truism that the enviromental movement is just statism/marxism under another name. Those who are behind it wish to control your life via the hammer of the state. The excuse has changed but the general gist has not. Readers of this blog will know that I have been saying this for years.
Klaus wants to debate to Gore about the subject. You think Gore has the guts to debate such a clever man?
Krauthammer agrees with this line of reasoning.
1 Comment so far
Leave a comment
Attempts to shut down debate by claiming a consensus are anything but scientific. Science requires constant challenge of the established wisdom in order to discover new truth. The scientific method is to take a hypothesis and try to prove it wrong and only if such attempts fail to accept it as true, so far as we know, for now. The great Global Warming campaign goes the opposite way – forming a hypothesis, creating climate models that agree with the hypothesis on the basis of the assumptions built into them then trumpeting “Look how our models predict doom! We must act now!”