Treason?
With the possibility of treason charges against hate-mongers I have posted a few thoughts about civil-libertarian groups.
Lets hope the evil British-born scum in this video get captured and charged with treason as well.
Comments are off for this postIs there humour in Islam?
From Sunday Telegraph’s letters page:
Apropos Niall Ferguson’s stimulating thoughts on religion,G K Chesterton also wrote: “It is the test of a good religion whether you can make a joke about it.” Would Islam pass the test today?
Adrian Longley, London SW11
I rather think not Adrian. I don’t think any religion whose name means subserviance is going to be capable of laughing at itself.
A good piece in TCS by Bryan Preston on the Van Goth murder.
Update: It seems that Silent Running’s SNN broadcasts (in which I feature) is considered zionazi by some “moderate” Aussie Muslim.
Comments are off for this postRoots To Branches
crusades and creeds descend like fiery flakes of snow.
bad mouth on a prayer day, hope no one’s listening.
roots down in the wet clay, branches glistening.
James Doyle at normblog enters the Left’s hall of mirrors and comes through unillusioned:
the view seems to be that if one is provoked into doing something awful, the primary responsibility lies with the provoker. Blair is responsible for the bombings, they say, because if he hadn’t gone along with the Iraq war the bombings wouldn’t have happened. But no one will deny that if the bombers hadn’t blown people up in London, there would not have been the appalling recent increase in attacks on mosques. So the same reasoning determines that the primary responsibility for the increase in attacks lies not with the Islamophobic thugs who carry them out, but with the bombers; a proposition Blair’s critics are unlikely to concede. Many of them are presumably inclined to hold him responsible for the mosque attacks as well. But then if we are supposed to go back three stages along the chain of provocation, Blair cannot have been responsible for the bombings after all: that honour must belong to whoever provoked him: Saddam Hussein, perhaps? With such critics, one gets the sense not just that Blair (and Bush) are as a matter of fact responsible for nearly everything bad that happens in this arena, which is already implausible enough, but that these leaders have a special metaphysical status: only they can be responsible. Everyone else is just a pawn in their game. Thus the claim that Blair is directly or primarily responsible for the bombings rests on a paranoid fantasy.Comments are off for this post
Sunday Times expose Islamists…
Its good to see some in the MSM are keeping track of the Islamist groupings in the UK. The Insight Team went undercover to attend meetings of The Saviour Sect an extremist grouping that not only condons suicide bombing it actively encourages it. Of course, this is nothing new to those who read sites like Harry’s Place regularly. This what Londoners and the British are up against in modern Britain.
Found via a piece on Blogcritics.
Comments are off for this post
