More fun and games
After 6 months top reporting, the intrepid Socialist crusader managed to find a few racist comments from members of the far Right BNP. Is there any organisation on the planet where racist comments could not be heard during 6 months secret taping?
British mosques were not visited. Now theres a surprise.
Im no BNP fan, but compared to the new crop of home-grown jihad warriors currently being indoctrinated and made ready for battle across our troubled land, I find it difficult to get excited about some blokes saying stupid things in a pub.
Perhaps when trains start exploding around London, the BBC will get round to doing an expose on whats going on in Mosques.
Heres part of what the BNP say:
This documentary will once again be a liberal middle class demonisation of the white working class community that they fear and hate. It will feature poor white people who will be held up as evil, but whose plight or concerns will not be addressed. It will be used to attack and crucify the poor white folk of England but will offer no solution to their plight or pain. It will be used to vilify the weak and the forgotten white underclass of Britain and present them as perverse aliens existing in the dark margins of our wonderful multi-cultural society. It will seek to portray all whites in the BNP in a racist and discriminatory manner that will only encourage more racial attacks upon the poor white people of this country.If this were a documentary about Gypsies or Muslims it would be called racist and spiteful and an attempt to smear them all as stereotypical monsters whose innate humanity need not be considered in any way.
We ask the British people to ponder this question after they watch this documentary – the next time you drive past an old abandoned white Welsh mining town, or white Cornish fishing community, or white northern steel town, or white Scottish industrial town why is it that no one ever makes a documentary about their plight and pain.
Andrew updates: Harry’s Place has reaction to this and a link to an excellent piece in today’s DT.
2 commentsThe Jewish experience in France
Asparagirl gives a breakdown on just how bad it has gotten. It makes for pretty distressing reading. Is there any wonder that Jews are leaving France for the US, the UK, and Israel?
Found via Damian.
Comments are off for this postClaxon sounds
Message created by Michele and adapted by Andrew.
Site Notice for the Dense:
This site is NOT fair and balanced, nor does it purport to be. It’s owner and contributors are obviously a bit right of center and clearly think the far left are off their collective rockers. This should be readily apparent to anyone who has read more than one post here.
This is a PERSONAL site. It is not representative of any media entity, therefore the words posted here are opinions, for the most part. As an independent quasi-journalist, the owner (and any contributor) of this site is not beholden to any rules or ethics that demand fairness in reporting. Thus, you will see a lot of posts supporting the owner (and contributors’) ideals and opinions, and not so many – probably none – supporting yours.
The owner and any contributor to this site is not a paid journalist and you are not his or her boss/editor. Therefore, we are under no obligation to write about the things you think we should be writing about. There are no editorial meetings held with readers every morning to go over the day’s stories. This site is not run by a democratic process; the stories that get covered are the stories the owner and contributors feel like writing about that day. This site is run on whim and personal preferences.
However, should you feel that you have some sort of right to determine what should and shouldn’t be printed here, you can feel free to supply a monthly (bi-weekly works as well) check made out to the owner of the site, making you the boss and securing an agreement that we will answer to you and allow you to make editorial decisions. The check would have to be a sufficient amount that would be worth the owner of this site giving up his personal freedom to post what he wants, when he wants. In other words, keep your editorial comments to yourself.
The owner of this site has run out of patience with people in general. In fact, he is of the thought that a good portion of humanity sucks and that most of those who do suck often spend their days leaving comments on blogs.
Once again, the owner of this site would like to reiterate that this site is totally, completely biased and makes no apologies for it, nor should we. We pay for the bandwidth, we pay for the hosting fees, we do this all in our spare time for free, and if you really want to complain about free ice cream, we suggest that you can take that ice cream and – to put it nicely – fornicate yourself with it.
Thank you, and have a pleasant tomorrow.
Instructions: Adjust for numbers/genders/proclivities as local conditions warrant; rinse; repeat.
3 commentsC.o.V. up
Go visit…why don’t you?
Comments are off for this postTin-foil brigade rants…
Alas this lot of paranoid loons are armed to the teeth and want to bring about armageddon. What am I talking about? Al-Queda’s reaction to the Saudi request they give themselves up or else. One thing that puzzles me is that if a Christian or Jewish grouping were to release a statement blithering on about daemons and devilry the left would think them mad lunatics. If a bunch of ROPMA do it, there are those on the far-left who find nothing wrong with it.
Comments are off for this postWhole Lotta Rosie
she ain’t exactly pretty
ain’t exactly small
fort’two thirt’nine, fiftysix
you could say she got it all
—ac/dc
Noted Constitutional expert Rosie O’Donnell weighs in on the Federal Marriage Amendment:
“It will be the first time, except for prohibition, that bigotry has been added to the Constitution,” O’Donnell said. “That the prevention of rights and exclusion of rights takes paramount over some religious ideology. And, supposedly, that is what we are fighting in Iraq—A religious extreme government that is not letting people live freely.”
Prohibition was about bigotry? Against whom—drunks?
I’ll leave it to readers to parse the remainder of Ms. O’Donnell’s dotty ramblings.
2 comments
