Jan 17
8782215
AirStripOne
has responded to my comments about their view of the Anglosphere. Goldstein wonders why I refer to him as a moron. He claims that I missing the point of his posts on the subject. The moron comment was only in response to calling us “Anglospheracists” and “cultists.” Hardly terms of endearment now are they?
As far as the rest of his comments go, he thinks the organisation is, by association, racist because it includes the US and the “white commonwealth”. He fails to realise that the Anglosphere is based on historical and philosophical links rather than racial ones. The countries in the Anglosphere are not homogeneous and neither should they be. If the organisation fulfills its goals then eventually non-white countries will be in the majority.
The aim of the Anglosphere is not to envelope any country within it. It merely seeks to strengthen ties that have been eroded due to the efforts of the left and the European Union. The European Union wants to the UK to ditch its legal, philosophical and cultural history in order that it might “better” Europeans. The Anglosphere has no such desire, prefering to preserve the theories of freedom, natural justice and law that exist amoungst the countries spawned by the UK. As Bennett has said, “the Anglosphere is a memtic concept, not a genetic one.”
Rather than weakening Britian’s ability to act on the world stage. the Anglosphere prospect would ensure a presence thereon. Goldstein need not worry, the Anglosphere is not more American cultural imperialism.
